AArvindExecutive Cockpit

Order & Quoting 360

Six order/quoting systems, one pipeline — federated win-rate, discounting and velocity, and the margin lost to off-platform legacy tools.

Arvind Limited · FY26 (Mar'26, actuals)
Among the world's largest denim makers
25,800 employees · 12+ plants & units · 30 export markets
Executive read· the answer, then the moves

Migrating the 3 legacy mill / spreadsheet tools onto SAP recovers ~₹357 Cr on orders Arvind already quotes — ₹67 Cr of discount leakage plus ₹290 Cr of win-rate uplift. The off-platform tools win less and discount more, with no central pricing governance.

4 of 4 headline metrics improving vs prior · all on or above target

Do now — ranked by urgency
  1. 1
    Stop the ₹67 Cr discount leakage on legacy toolsWatch
    Why it matters

    Legacy mill tools discount at 14% vs the SAP 6% — recovering ₹67 Cr of margin on the deals they already win, no new selling required.

    What's driving it
    • Legacy discount 14% vs SAP 6%
    • ₹3,050 Cr of legacy quotes off governed pricing
    FYI
    • Affected tools: denim-mill estimator, export-desk pricing, knits/Envisol spreadsheets (3 systems)
    • Owner: Finance / Pricing
  2. 2
    Lift legacy win-rate to capture ₹290 Cr of bookingsOpportunity
    Why it matters

    Bringing legacy win-rate from 28% to the SAP 37% on ₹3,050 Cr of quotes adds ₹290 Cr of bookings.

    What's driving it
    • Legacy win 28% vs SAP 37%
    • Cycle 13d slower off-platform
    FYI
    • 3 SAP-based systems already run governed approval workflow
    • Owner: CMO / Sales Ops
  3. 3
    Standardize everyone onto SAP — ₹357 Cr prizeOpportunity
    Why it matters

    One price book and approval workflow recovers ~₹357 Cr combined and flips these divisions from estimates to plant-grain actuals.

    What's driving it
    • ₹67 Cr discount + ₹290 Cr win-rate = ₹357 Cr
    • 13d faster quote→order on SAP
    FYI
    • ₹11,900 Cr of open quotes federated across 6 systems
    • Owner: CMO / Sales Ops
🌱 Sustainability & circularityStep 7 of 7 · standardize order & quoting systemsCustomer MasterJourney complete ✓All journeys
🌐 Enterprise 360 modules· on Order / Quoting 360Browse all 31 views ▾
● LiveBuilt forCMO / Sales Ops· one pipeline, one win-rateFinance / Pricing· stop discount leakageDivision leaders· quote velocity by system

Each division still quotes in its own system — SAP SD, SAP CPQ, the denim-mill estimator, an export-desk tool, spreadsheets. Federated, they total ₹11,900 Cr of open quotes; but the off-platform legacy mill systems win less and discount more, with no central pricing governance. One view shows where the margin leaks.

Data backing: quote_system (per-system quotes, value, win-rate, discount, cycle) · SAP federation
6
Quoting systems
across divisions
9,450
Open quotes
₹11,900 Cr value
35%
Blended win-rate
by ₹ value
8%
Avg discount
off list
15d
Avg quote→order
cycle time
Federated pipeline

Every quoting system, one table

SAP-based systems (governed pricing) vs standalone legacy mill ones — note how win-rate falls and discount/cycle rise off-platform.

Quoting systemDivisionQuotesValueWin-rateDiscountCycleStatus
SAP SD (core ERP)Woven + Denim4200
₹5,200 Cr
36%6%12dIntegrated
Garments program quoting (SAP)Garments1800
₹1,900 Cr
41%5%10dIntegrated
AMD quoting (SAP CPQ)Advanced Materials1200
₹1,750 Cr
38%7%14dIntegrated
Denim mill legacy estimatorDenim950
₹1,450 Cr
28%14%24dStandalone
Export-desk pricing toolExports700
₹900 Cr
31%12%20dStandalone
Knits / Envisol spreadsheetsKnits + Environmental600
₹700 Cr
24%16%30dStandalone
SAP-based systems (3)
₹8,850 Cr of quotes · 37% win · 6% discount. Governed pricing and approval workflow.
Standalone legacy (3)
₹3,050 Cr of quotes · 28% win · 14% discount · slower cycle. No central governance — denim-mill estimator, export-desk pricing, knits/Envisol spreadsheets.
The consolidation prize

Move everyone onto SAP

Bringing the legacy mill tools to the SAP systems' discipline is worth real money on orders Arvind is already quoting.

Discount leakage recovered
+₹67 Cr

If standalone tools discounted at the integrated 6% instead of 14%, on the deals they already win.

Bookings from win-rate
+₹290 Cr

Lifting standalone win-rate from 28% to the integrated 37% on ₹3,050 Cr of quotes.

Faster cash
13d

Standalone quote→order cycles run far longer; one CPQ shortens time-to-revenue and frees pursuit capacity.

The move: migrate the denim-mill estimator, export-desk pricing tool and knits/Envisol spreadsheets onto SAP with one price book and approval workflow. It recovers ~₹357 Cr combined, and — like the customer master — it's the same standardization that flips these divisions from estimates to plant-grain actuals everywhere else in the cockpit.