AArvindExecutive Cockpit

Sales / Pipeline 360

The front of the funnel — pipeline by stage, forecast vs plan, win/loss, and the deals that decide the quarter.

Arvind Limited · FY26 (Mar'26, actuals)
Among the world's largest denim makers
25,800 employees · 12+ plants & units · 30 export markets
Executive read· the answer, then the moves

Q3 FY26 commit ₹2,050 Cr sits ₹300 Cr below the ₹2,350 Cr plan — ₹650 Cr of best-case upside must convert to make the number. Coverage is 6x on ₹14,200 Cr of pipeline; the call is winnable but only if the at-risk upside is forced to close.

3 of 3 headline metrics improving vs prior · all on or above target

Do now — ranked by urgency
  1. 1
    Convert ₹650 Cr of best-case upside to close the ₹300 Cr plan gapAct now
    Why it matters

    Commit ₹2,050 Cr is ₹300 Cr short of the ₹2,350 Cr Q3 FY26 plan — the gap that decides whether the quarter lands.

    What's driving it
    • Q3 FY26 commit ₹2,050 Cr vs ₹2,350 Cr plan
    • ₹650 Cr best-case upside above commit
    FYI
    • Pipeline ₹14,200 Cr (6x coverage), ₹6,120 Cr weighted
    • Owner: CRO
  2. 2
    ₹80 Cr of programs at risk — Q4 FY26Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost program is value-added & AMD revenue that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q4 FY26
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹510 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q4 FY26, ₹80 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Chief Marketing & Sales Officer
  3. 3
    ₹90 Cr of programs at risk — Q2 FY27Act now
    Why it matters

    Each lost program is value-added & AMD revenue that won't repeat.

    What's driving it
    • renewal window Q2 FY27
    • Signal: Order-book risk
    FYI
    • Of ₹470 Cr of programs up for renewal in Q2 FY27, ₹90 Cr is at risk of non-repeat.
    • Owner: Chief Marketing & Sales Officer
  4. 4
    Attack the top loss reason: Price (commodity competition) (₹950 Cr lost)Watch
    Why it matters

    ₹-win-rate is 67% (₹4,280 Cr won vs ₹2,100 Cr lost); Price (commodity competition) is the single largest leak at ₹950 Cr.

    What's driving it
    • ₹-win-rate 67%
    • Top loss Price (commodity competition) ₹950 Cr across 70 deals
    FYI
    • Top win driver: Vertical integration / one-stop fibre-to-fashion ₹2,100 Cr
    • Tighten discount discipline via Quote 360
📈 Growth & exportsStep 1 of 6 · order book & forecastCustomer 360All journeys
🌐 Enterprise 360 modules· on Order-Book / Sales 360Browse all 31 views ▾
● LiveBuilt forCMO / Sales VPs· coverage & forecast callSales Ops· stage velocity & hygieneCEO / Board· will we make the quarter

Arvind is pursuing ₹14,200 Cr of order pipeline across the funnel (₹6,120 Cr weighted). This view answers the sales chief's two questions — will we make the quarter (forecast vs plan) and why we win or lose — and points at the deals that move the number.

Data backing: pipeline_stage · forecast · winloss · opportunity · kpi
₹14,200 Cr
Qualified pipeline
1010 opps
₹6,120 Cr
Weighted pipeline
value × win-prob
67%
₹-Win-rate
won ÷ (won+lost) ₹
₹9,800 Cr
Bookings
book-to-bill 1.05x
₹4,200 Cr
Backlog
signed, not delivered
Coverage

Pipeline by stage

Value and win-probability rise toward the close — weighted value is what to bank on.

Qualify · 480 opps · 20% win₹4,900 Cr
Develop · 300 opps · 40% win₹4,100 Cr
Proposal · 170 opps · 60% win₹3,300 Cr
Negotiation · 60 opps · 80% win₹1,900 Cr

Dark fill = win-probability within each stage's value. Weighted pipeline totals ₹6,120 Cr.

The forecast call

Q3 FY26 — ₹2,050 Cr commit vs ₹2,350 Cr plan

Commit, best-case and closed-to-date against the plan line.

Q1 FY26 · actualclosed ₹2,280 Cr vs plan ₹2,250 Cr
Q2 FY26 · actualclosed ₹2,290 Cr vs plan ₹2,320 Cr
Q3 FY26 · currentcommit ₹2,050 Cr · best ₹2,700 Cr
Q4 FY26 · forecastcommit ₹1,500 Cr · best ₹2,900 Cr

Q3 FY26: commit ₹2,050 Cr is ₹300 Cr below the ₹2,350 Cr plan; ₹650 Cr of best-case upside must convert to close the gap. Black line = plan.

Why we win & lose

₹-win-rate 67% · ₹4,280 Cr won vs ₹2,100 Cr lost

Clone the win reasons into low-win families; attack the top loss reason first.

Why we win
Vertical integration / one-stop fibre-to-fashion₹2,100 Cr · 142
Sustainability & circularity credentials₹1,300 Cr · 96
Value-added / AMD differentiation₹880 Cr · 61
Why we lose
Price (commodity competition)₹950 Cr · 70
Lead time / capacity₹700 Cr · 38
Tariff / FX competitiveness₹450 Cr · 24

Read it: vertical integration / one-stop fibre-to-fashion wins the most (₹2,100 Cr); Price (commodity competition) is the top loss (₹950 Cr) — tighten discount discipline (see Order & Quoting 360) before chasing new demand.

Move the number

Named deals in play

Signal-sourced deals convert higher — prioritize them.

OpportunityCustomerSolutionValueStageWin %Source
H&M — multi-year recycled-fibre garment program (PAMI)H&MGarments + Sustainability₹320 CrProposal60%signal
Indian Defence — FR protective-gear tender (AMD)Indian Defence / OrdnanceAdvanced Materials₹240 CrQualify45%signal
Levi's — sustainable-denim capacity expansionLevi Strauss & Co.Denim + Value-Added₹180 CrDevelop55%signal
Uniqlo — knits volume ramp (India sourcing)Fast Retailing (Uniqlo)Knits + Garments₹150 CrProposal50%outbound
Tata Motors — lightweight composites supply (AMD)Tata Motors / Auto OEMsAdvanced Materials₹130 CrQualify40%outbound
PVH — premium shirting cross-sell to garmentsPVH (Tommy / Calvin Klein)Woven + Garments₹110 CrDevelop48%signal